Amplified thinking.
Two different artificial intelligences argue your case. The third voice in the council is yours.
What it is
Ripper Brainstorm is a space for hard decisions. You take a seat in a council with two voices from different providers. They share neither a base model nor the same blind spots, so their disagreement means something — and you lead the conversation.
The conversation stops with you. You can also let the voices run a few exchanges on their own — as many as you set — but they will not start without you, and once the allowance runs out they come back for your view. You draw the line, not them.
This is also my test bench. When I want to know how two models handle the same problem, I sit them side by side here and watch where they diverge — on one task, with a record I can return to.
Ripper Brainstorm amplifies your thinking — it does not think for you. The voices advise and disagree; the decision and the final authorship stay with you.
How it works
- 1Set the topic. A question, a decision, a plan, a prompt — anything that needs thought.
- 2Lead the council. The voices respond in turn, and you moderate in your own words, not with a button. Each voice must state how it read you before it answers.
- 3Close with knowledge. The synthesis and decision as your document, with an auditable trace of the reasoning.
Why the trace matters
Every session leaves a reproducible, immutable record — what was decided, where the dispute was, what stayed open. It is the memory of the process, not just the result. You return to the “why”, not only the “what”.
Built for a specific need
This is one example of what can be built. If you see something in yourself or in your company that could work better and more efficiently — write to me in a few sentences. I answer personally and tell you how I can help.